Review: A Most Improper Magick (Kat Stephenson #1) – Stephanie Burgis

Synopsis from Goodreads
“I was twelve years of age when I chopped off my hair, dressed as a boy, and set off to save my family from impending ruin.

“I made it almost to the end of my front garden…”

Magic may be the greatest scandal in Regency England. But that’s not going to stop Kat Stephenson when there are highwaymen to foil, sinister aristocrats to defeat…and true loves to capture for her two older sisters.

I’m going to try and keep this review short as sweet*, like our heroine Kat Stephenson.
Whenever I read a book set in this era, I always get a bit of an uneasy feeling because I know it’s going to inevitably lead to my most dreaded confession: I don’t like Jane Austen. The first thing you think of when it’s books from this period is her so I feel like, when reading a book set in this time, that I’m gate crashing a party that no one wants me at.

But whatever, because I loved this book and I’m glad I went to the party and ate all the cake before all you Austen fans got any.


This book was so charming. It’s the kind of book you should read on a dewy Saturday morning before any one is up with a steaming mug of tea in front of you. Or, well, coffee if you’re that kind of person.
I simply adored Kat. She was such a perfect narrator; fun, observant, clever and just a little oblivious to the things going on around her.

But it was the sisters and their interactions that stole my heart. I know I’m always chattin’ on about how I wish that YA books focussed on familial relationships, especially those of the sibling variety, but it’s true. It’s such a minefield for love and humour and, on the whole, it’s completely untapped. It took me a while to put my finger on why I loved these sisters so much. Sure they were hilarious, realistic, sassy and their interactions were simply wonderful. But it was something more than that. And then I realised what it was.

Basically, the Stephenson sisters are the slightly sassier British cousins of the March sisters. And, even better, they don’t even have an Amy counterpart!
I know I’ve just opened a can of worms because all the Amy March fans will come crawling out of the woodwork and pelt me with limes as they cackle over the embers of my burning manuscript. My Amy March rant is almost as long as my Mockingjay rant, and this review is neither the time or place for such a rant but I have to say: I wish Laurie and Jo had carried on skating as Amy floundered in the icy water.

Sorry, sore subject.

Anyway, where was I? Oh yes! The Stephensons. I loved them. My favourite of the sisters was, naturally, the snarky difficult Angeline because she was… well, snarky and difficult. I am a bit jealous of her because of a certain dashing gentlemen with sideburns. Actually, he might not have sideburns but I’m pretending he does. She was simply brilliant.

And I loved how Ms Burgis portrayed Elissa through the cynical and constant-rolling eyes of Kat and Angeline. The part at the end… with the masked man? Pahahaha. It made me think of all the simpering heroines that I (wrongly, before you all SHOUT at me) that I associate with Austen-esque books and the way that Elissa was poked fun at (in a nice way, of course) made me feel like Ms Burgis was giving me a secret wink. Though she probably wasn’t.

I also adored the setting. As much as it’s going to pain my Cheshire heart, Yorkshire does provide the best background for books. What with ramshackled abbeys and sprawling moors, the atmosphere was brilliant and perfectly complimented the magic that Ms Burgis weaved through her story. As much as I know and appreciate the readers who love their urban fantasy, I always think that magic is more suited to take place in the middle of the countryside, where secrets dwell in the dark corners of wild forests and dilapidated buildings.

“In our house, and in our comfortable little village, despite how hilly it was, you could almost forget we lived in Yorkshire. But the Dales were different. Wild. Dangerous. As massive, craggy hills rose high before us and a rock chasm opened up beside the road…. a hawk soared over our carriage, letting out a high, piercing cry of defiance, and I wanted to jump out of the window and fly with it.”

This is what I was imagining.



Actually, that picture was taken when I went searching for my other favourite book set in Yorkshire. Can you guess which one?

This book was glorious and a wonderful surprise. A really promising start to what looks to be a fantastic and unique serious with a spirited heroine and men with delicious sideburns.

Wait, ok… the men might not actually have sideburns, delicious or not. Please don’t just read this book for the sideburns, because you may be disappointed. Please read it because of the story and the characters, because then I assure you, you won’t be disappointed.

*Don’t tell her I said that because she’ll boot me in the shins.

12 thoughts on “Review: A Most Improper Magick (Kat Stephenson #1) – Stephanie Burgis

  1. OMG, I love this so so much. Okay, so, after reading the first line of the blurb I was already frantically finding this book on Goodreads and checking to see if my library has a copy, because if there’s anything I’m a sucker for, it’s that kind of girl. Of course, I immediately realized it was already ON my Goodreads ‘no seriously…tbr’, so I’m a completely failure at follow through. BUT I promise to read this regardless of sideburns.

    It’s cool if you’re not into Austen, we’re all tea drinkers so I suppose that has to suffice. Also I literally guffawed at your Amy commentary. Don’t worry, I’m not a fan either. Though I do prefer that Jo ended up with Mr. Bhear rather than Laurie, you? Seriously though, regency era March sisters? Yes, please.

    • Thanks Heidi :) I really think you’d love this one, especially if you’re a fan of regency era.

      I guess I am glad that she ends up with Mr Bhaer because he encourages her to be clever and wonderful. Laurie just becomes blargh and simpering and he grows a seriously misguided moustache (OK, that’s just the film but I imagine Amy makes him grow one too).and urgh.

      So yes, I guess I’m more Team Bhaer but ONLY because Amy ruins him. WITH HER STUPIDNESS.

      Seriously, can of worms.

      But I hope you get to read this soon, I’d love to know what you think!

      • Lol, I do feel like Laurie ruined himself before Amy got a hold of him, but she surely didn’t help matters. :P

        I hope so too! I didn’t realize until I checked that this was ‘Kat Incoureagable’ in the US. I just need to finish some of the other series I’m in the middle of before I start a new one!

  2. I’ve been meaning to read this book for ages and have already been convinced of how brilliant it is. But the main reason for my comment is: I hate Amy March as much as you do. Maybe even more. Your line about how Laurie and Jo should have kept on skating and let her drown drew a surprised shout of laughter from me. That simpering little girl’s a sore spot with me, too. How DARE she burn Jo’s manuscripts? Jo might have forgiven her, but I never will.

  3. What a delicious review! :)

    It’s raining outside now and I’ve spent the past two hours reading my favorite book review blogs.. (hint: you should feel flattered, since that includes yours)…and this review made me think.

    You’re right. The March sisters SHOULD have left Amy behind.

    umm…that…was not what I was originally intending to say.


    I wish there WERE more books with siblings in them! But good siblings with good relationships !! And snark! MUST have snark!! :D

    Great review! Now I wanna read the book… :)

    • Haha, thanks Alejandra! I am flattered and extremely pleased. :D

      I love how we are united in our anger for Miss March. And our want for more books about siblings :)

      Glad you enjoyed my review but now go… shoo.. read this book!

    • And that, my dearest Maggie, is why I would NEVER burn your manuscript.

      Also because I snorted in the most unladylike manner.

      Also, because you’re awesome.


  4. Pingback: Review: A Tangle of Magicks (Kat Stephenson #2) – Stephanie Burgis « weartheoldcoat

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s